14
Aug

Everyone seems to have an opinion about the now-infamously retouched photo of Kelly Clarkson that appeared on the cover of SELF Magazine.

kelly-clarkson-320

Fans seem to be outraged by the changes, while the magazine is defending its retouching as simply making Clarkson look her best.

What do you think? Does magazine retouching set unachievable standards? Do you trust the images you see in magazines? How do you feel about this latest Photoshop controversy? You tell us!

Comments

comments

Tags: , , , , ,
Category: You Tell Us
Bookmark the permalink

One Response to

  1. Ministylista says:

    I wish I could get retouched. I guess their comment on making her look her best is saying she doesn’t look that great in real life. I think that is a sad. The changed her face so much I had no idea that was her on the cover. It looks like a young Martha Stewart.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>